From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martorello v. Consol. Edison Co., N.Y., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 29, 1999
260 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 29, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.).


The motion was properly denied absent an explanation why it was not made at the time that defendant moved to vacate the note of issue on the ground that plaintiff had failed to comply with all outstanding disclosure demands. Moreover, there is no showing that plaintiff's dilatory conduct in providing disclosure prevented defendant from moving for summary judgment.

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.


Summaries of

Martorello v. Consol. Edison Co., N.Y., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 29, 1999
260 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Martorello v. Consol. Edison Co., N.Y., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD S. MARTORELLO, Respondent, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 82

Citing Cases

Sakow v. Trilobite, LLC

The movants have failed to show that their inability to obtain information regarding plaintiff's 2005…

Sakow v. Trilobite, LLC

The movants have failed to show that their inability to obtain information regarding plaintiff's 2005…