From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martino v. City of Benicia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02182-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02182-JAM-EFB

10-17-2011

JANET MARTINO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BENICIA; BOB'S TOWING SERVICE, INC.; DARLENE JALONEK and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants.

David R. Olick Attorneys for Plaintiff JANET MARTINO SELMAN BREITMAN LLP Danielle K. Lewis GREGG A. THORNTON DANIELLE K. LEWIS Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BENICIA and DARLENE JALONEK SMITH & BURSTEIN JACK BURSTEIN Attorneys for Defendant BOB'S TOW SERVICE


GREGG A. THORNTON (SBN 14 6282)

DANIELLE K. LEWIS (SBN 218274)

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF BENICIA AND DARLENE

JALONEK

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; AND ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective attorneys, submit this stipulated request for an extension of time to file the Joint Status Report required by this court's order of August 17, 2011.

Pursuant to the court's order, the parties' Joint Status Report is due within sixty (60) days of service of the complaint on any party, or from the date of removal. In this matter, defendants filed a notice of removal on August 17, 2011. As such, the parties' Joint Status Report is currently due on October 17, 2011.

The pleadings in this matter are not yet at issue. First, plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action, which defendants have opposed, is set for hearing before the court on October 19, 2011. Next, pursuant to the court's order, defendants CITY OF BENICIA and DARLENE JALONEK's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is set for hearing on November 2, 2011. (DOC #23)

In light of the uncertainty of the pleadings, the parties are unable to meaningfully meet and confer regarding future amendment of pleadings, anticipated motions, anticipated discovery, future proceedings, estimate regarding trial time, pretrial procedures or the appropriateness of a settlement conference.

Therefore, the parties request that the court extend the time by which the parties must submit a Joint Status Report until November 30, 2011, or any date thereafter that the court deems appropriate.

It is so stipulated:

By: David R. Olick

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JANET MARTINO

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

By: Danielle K. Lewis

GREGG A. THORNTON

DANIELLE K. LEWIS

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF BENICIA and

DARLENE JALONEK

SMITH & BURSTEIN

By: JACK BURSTEIN

Attorneys for Defendant

BOB'S TOW SERVICE

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the court hereby orders that the parties submit a joint status report on November 30, 2011. The contents of the joint status report shall be in conformance with this court's order of August 17, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. John A. Mendez

United States District Judge

Eastern District of California


Summaries of

Martino v. City of Benicia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02182-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Martino v. City of Benicia

Case Details

Full title:JANET MARTINO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BENICIA; BOB'S TOWING SERVICE, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02182-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)