From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martini v. Martini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 25, 2001.

June 25, 2001.

In an action for the partition of real property, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated March 15, 2000, as granted those branches of the motion of the temporary receiver which were to authorize the payment of a commission in the sum of $76,473.60, and the payment of an attorney's fee in the sum of $21,585.

Cantor, Coscia Schustal, LLP (Michael A. Coscia of counsel), and Barry Elisofon, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants (one brief filed).

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the motion which was to authorize the payment of an attorney's fee in the sum of $21,585, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to the defendants.

The Supreme Court erred in authorizing an award of an attorney's fee. Although a court may authorize the appointment of counsel nunc pro tunc (see, Bozewicz v. Nash Metal Ware Co., 280 A.D.2d 443), "[i]t is the rule that a Receiver who is a lawyer is expected to perform customary legal duties connected with his tenure" (Strober v. Warren Prop. Co., 84 A.D.2d 834, 836). Since the services rendered by counsel do not appear to have been extraordinary, the amount awarded as compensation for legal services should have been deducted from the sum awarded to the receiver as his commissions (see, Strober v. Warren Prop. Co., supra, at 836; Lentine v. Fundaro, 56 A.D.2d 592).

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., ALTMAN, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martini v. Martini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 2001
284 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Martini v. Martini

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN A. MARTINI, respondent, v. ANDREW MARTINI, ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 322

Citing Cases

Mishcon De Reya N.Y. LLP v. Grail Semiconductor, Inc.

Mishcon's contention that K&L Gates "failed to oppose aggressive third-party discovery" is inaccurate because…

Katz v. Glassworks LLC

The receiver is herself an attorney and has the ability to carry out any legal proceedings necessary. When a…