Opinion
October 12, 1976
In a medical malpractice action, the appeals, as limited by appellants' briefs, are from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 16, 1975, upon a jury verdict, as is in favor of plaintiff-respondent and against appellants. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiff-respondent jointly against appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The evidence in the record amply supports the jury verdict. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.