From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Wells Fargo Bank

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 11, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00142-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 11, 2014)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00142-CV

09-11-2014

ROLANDO R. MARTINEZ, LORRI MARTINEZ, AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Appellee.


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on July 11, 2014. On August 6, 2014, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 11th day of September, 2014.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Wells Fargo Bank

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 11, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00142-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Martinez v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:ROLANDO R. MARTINEZ, LORRI MARTINEZ, AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellants, v…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Sep 11, 2014

Citations

NUMBER 13-14-00142-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 11, 2014)