From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Virga

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0942 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0942 KJN P.

September 19, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. No. 5.) By order filed July 8, 2011, plaintiff's third amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a fourth amended complaint was granted. On August 9, 2011, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file a fourth amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a fourth amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Martinez v. Virga

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0942 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Martinez v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK A. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. VIRGA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0942 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)