From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. J. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 31, 2014
Case No. CV 14-4144-AG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-4144-AG (JEM)

12-31-2014

EDWARD J. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: December 31, 2014

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Martinez v. J. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 31, 2014
Case No. CV 14-4144-AG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Martinez v. J. Soto

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD J. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 31, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 14-4144-AG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)