From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Reyes

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Oct 7, 2020
307 So. 3d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1054

10-07-2020

Heriberto Ernesto MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. Siren REYES, Appellee.

Orshan, Spann & Fernandez-Mesa, and Steven P. Spann and Jamie Segal Davis, for appellant. Appellee precluded from filing an answer brief and from oral argument.


Orshan, Spann & Fernandez-Mesa, and Steven P. Spann and Jamie Segal Davis, for appellant.

Appellee precluded from filing an answer brief and from oral argument.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. We conclude that the trial court's decision is based on competent, substantial evidence including the age of the infant and is not an abuse of discretion. See Hoff v. Hoff, 100 So. 3d 1164, 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding "in proceedings where trial judges are required to determine interim timesharing schedules, the limited nature of a temporary hearing and necessity for quick action by the trial judge require us to defer to the trial court's exercise of its discretion").

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Reyes

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Oct 7, 2020
307 So. 3d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Martinez v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:Heriberto Ernesto Martinez, Appellant, v. Siren Reyes, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Oct 7, 2020

Citations

307 So. 3d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)