Opinion
No. 3D20-1054
10-07-2020
Orshan, Spann & Fernandez-Mesa, and Steven P. Spann and Jamie Segal Davis, for appellant. Appellee precluded from filing an answer brief and from oral argument.
Orshan, Spann & Fernandez-Mesa, and Steven P. Spann and Jamie Segal Davis, for appellant.
Appellee precluded from filing an answer brief and from oral argument.
Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We conclude that the trial court's decision is based on competent, substantial evidence including the age of the infant and is not an abuse of discretion. See Hoff v. Hoff, 100 So. 3d 1164, 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding "in proceedings where trial judges are required to determine interim timesharing schedules, the limited nature of a temporary hearing and necessity for quick action by the trial judge require us to defer to the trial court's exercise of its discretion").
Affirmed.