Martinez v. Presbyterian Hospital

1 Citing case

  1. Rotundo v. S C Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    255 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 16 times

    The Supreme Court erred in granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the respondents individually ( see, Porcelli v. Zapparo, 140 A.D.2d 423). The MRI report interpreting the infant plaintiff's MRI scan, and distinctly bearing the respondents' names directly beneath its findings, constituted admissible documentary evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the respondents were involved in the allegedly erroneous interpretation of the MRI ( see, Porcelli v. Zapparo, supra; see also, Martinez v. Presbyterian Hosp., 186 A.D.2d 369).