From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Pompeo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
Jan 8, 2019
Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-116 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-116

01-08-2019

AGUSTIN ACOSTA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. MIKE POMPEO, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (hereafter the "R&R") (Docket No. 17) in the above-captioned case. The R&R recommended the Court dismiss this civil action, without prejudice for Agustin Acosta Martinez's (hereafter "Plaintiff") failure to serve Mike Pompeo (hereafter "Defendant"). See Docket No. 17. Objections were due December 26, 2018. No objections were filed by either party. After a de novo review of the record, the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (Docket No. 17) is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket No. 1) be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is further ORDERED to close this case.

Signed on this 8th day of January, 2019.

/s/_________

Rolando Olvera

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martinez v. Pompeo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
Jan 8, 2019
Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-116 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Martinez v. Pompeo

Case Details

Full title:AGUSTIN ACOSTA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. MIKE POMPEO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-116 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2019)