From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Texas
Nov 23, 1988
759 S.W.2d 114 (Tex. 1988)

Summary

holding court of appeals erred in taxing half of trial costs against party who prevailed at trial

Summary of this case from Save Our Springs Legal Defense Fund v. City of Austin

Opinion

No. C-7289.

April 27, 1988. Rehearing Denied November 23, 1988.

Appeal from the Cherokee County District Court No. 2, Morris Hassell, J.

John S. Ament, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Daniel B. Childs, Norman, Spiers, Thrall, Angle Guy, Jacksonville, for respondent.


This personal injury action concerns the propriety of an appellate court's retaxing of costs incurred in the trial court. Emeterio Corona, a minor, was injured while employed by respondent Joe Pierce, d/b/a Pierce Lumber and Tie Company. The injury required an amputation to Corona's forearm. Petitioner Adolph Martinez as next friend for Corona sued Pierce, a nonsubscriber to the Texas Workers' Compensation insurance program.

The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Corona for $24,025 and assessed all costs against Pierce. The court of appeals, in an unpublished opinion, held that Pierce was entitled to a credit and reduced the judgment of the trial court by $7,554.50. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court as reformed. The court of appeals also retaxed the costs incurred in the trial court, assessing one-half of the costs against Corona and one-half against Pierce. Taxing of costs against the successful party in the trial court is contrary to Rule 131 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Pursuant to Rule 133(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a majority of the court grants the application for writ of error and, without hearing oral argument, we modify the judgment of the court of appeals to tax all costs in the trial court against Pierce. As so modified, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Texas
Nov 23, 1988
759 S.W.2d 114 (Tex. 1988)

holding court of appeals erred in taxing half of trial costs against party who prevailed at trial

Summary of this case from Save Our Springs Legal Defense Fund v. City of Austin

taxing costs against successful party in trial court contrary to rules of civil procedure

Summary of this case from Nicholson v. Tashiro
Case details for

Martinez v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:Adolph MARTINEZ, a/n/f for Emeterio Saul Corona, Petitioner, v. Joe…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Nov 23, 1988

Citations

759 S.W.2d 114 (Tex. 1988)

Citing Cases

Statewide Bank v. Keith

Therefore, we reform the judgment to provide that Keith recover nothing on her claims against SNSC, and tax…

Save Our Springs Legal Defense Fund v. City of Austin

The same holds true even when the trial court grants the temporary injunction but the cause nevertheless…