From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Peery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 12, 2017
Case No. CV 15-7088-R (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-7088-R (JEM)

12-12-2017

PEDRO MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. S. PEERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the First Amended Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: December 12, 2017

/s/_________

MANUEL L. REAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Martinez v. Peery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 12, 2017
Case No. CV 15-7088-R (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Martinez v. Peery

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. S. PEERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 12, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 15-7088-R (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2017)