From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Multnomah County Assessor

Tax Court of Oregon
Oct 26, 2012
TC-MD 120732D (Or. T.C. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

TC-MD 120732D

10-26-2012

JOHN M. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant.


DECISION OF DISMISSAL

JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING MAGISTRATE

This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.

A case management conference was scheduled at 8:30 a.m. on October 8, 2012, to consider Plaintiff's appeal. On September 21, 2012, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiff at the email address Plaintiff provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that if Plaintiff did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal.

On October 8, 2012, the court sent Plaintiff a letter which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that if Plaintiff did not provide a written explanation by October 22, 2012, for his failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a written response to the court explaining his failure to appear at the October 8, 2012, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Multnomah County Assessor

Tax Court of Oregon
Oct 26, 2012
TC-MD 120732D (Or. T.C. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Martinez v. Multnomah County Assessor

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant.

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

TC-MD 120732D (Or. T.C. Oct. 26, 2012)