From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Mitzel

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Dec 6, 2023
Civil Action 1:20-cv-02411-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 6, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:20-cv-02411-CMA-MEH

12-06-2023

EUGENE F. MARTINEZ, JR., Plaintiff, v. MRS. MITZEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING OCTOBER 4, 2022, RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the November 14, 2023, Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 107), wherein Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty recommends that Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (Doc. # 105) be granted. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The Court affirms and adopts the Recommendation for the following reasons.

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 107 at 1 n.1.) Despite this advisement, no objection to Magistrate Judge Hegarty's Recommendation has been filed.

“[T]he district court is accorded considerable discretion with respect to the treatment of unchallenged magistrate reports. In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings”)).

After reviewing the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hegarty, in addition to applicable portions of the record and relevant legal authority, the Court is satisfied that the Recommendation is sound and not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:

• The November 14, 2023, Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 107) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an order of this Court; and
• The Clerk is directed to REOPEN this civil action for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Mitzel

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Dec 6, 2023
Civil Action 1:20-cv-02411-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Martinez v. Mitzel

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE F. MARTINEZ, JR., Plaintiff, v. MRS. MITZEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Colorado

Date published: Dec 6, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:20-cv-02411-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 6, 2023)