From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Matheny

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Nov 14, 2013
NO. 02-13-00300-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00300-CV

11-14-2013

OMAR MARTINEZ APPELLANT v. NORA MATHENY APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 22, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Matheny

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Nov 14, 2013
NO. 02-13-00300-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Martinez v. Matheny

Case Details

Full title:OMAR MARTINEZ APPELLANT v. NORA MATHENY APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-13-00300-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)