From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Lexus of Naperville

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jan 3, 2002
No. 01 C 9301 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 3, 2002)

Opinion

No. 01 C 9301

January 3, 2002


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This Court's December 6, 2001 memorandum order directed plaintiff Adrian Martinez ("Martinez") to explain the substantial disparity between the date of EEOC's right-to-sue letters and Martinez' claimed date of receipt of those letters — a disparity that raised an obvious question as to the possible untimeliness of Martinez' employment discrimination lawsuit against his former employers Lexus of Naperville and Dan Wolf Motors of Naperville, Inc. Because Martinez' December 13 "Additional Supplementary Filing" really confirmed the potential untimeliness problem rather than providing a satisfactory answer, this Court issued a further memorandum order on December 13 that granted Martinez some additional time (until December 27) to provide "any explanation that would justify keeping his lawsuit in court."

December 27 has now come and gone without anything further from Martinez. For the reasons expressed in both of this Court's memorandum orders, both Martinez' Complaint and this action are therefore dismissed as untimely. And that dismissal moots Martinez' Application To Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and his Motion for Appointment of Counsel.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Lexus of Naperville

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jan 3, 2002
No. 01 C 9301 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 3, 2002)
Case details for

Martinez v. Lexus of Naperville

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. LEXUS OF NAPERVILLE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 3, 2002

Citations

No. 01 C 9301 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 3, 2002)