From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Law Offices of Panatoni

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 14, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1958 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1958 MCE GGH PS.

February 14, 2006


ORDER


On November 29, 2005, a Findings and Recommendation was issued that this case be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Subsequent to that filing, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on December 19, 2005. Therefore, the Findings and Recommendation filed on November 29, 2005, is hereby vacated.

In an order filed October 27, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and he was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. The Clerk's office is directed to re-serve plaintiff with the order issued October 27, 2005 [docket #3]. Plaintiff's amended complaint is due thirty days from the filed date of this order.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Law Offices of Panatoni

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 14, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1958 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Martinez v. Law Offices of Panatoni

Case Details

Full title:BILL MARTINEZ, Plaintiffs, v. LAW OFFICES OF PANATONI, FARRELL, FRALAUB…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 14, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1958 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)