From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Konczewski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1982
441 N.E.2d 1117 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided October 7, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MARTHA K. ZELMAN, J.

Charles J. McEvily for appellant.

Fred Ehrlich for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 85 A.D.2d 717). We read the memorandum as determining that it is in the best interests of the child that custody remain in the mother.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Konczewski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1982
441 N.E.2d 1117 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Martinez v. Konczewski

Case Details

Full title:GAIL B.B. MARTINEZ, Respondent, v. MICHAEL B. KONCZEWSKI, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 7, 1982

Citations

441 N.E.2d 1117 (N.Y. 1982)
441 N.E.2d 1117
455 N.Y.S.2d 599

Citing Cases

Yeo v. Cornaire

A fundamental purpose of the separation agreement was to establish meaningful joint custody of the three…

Schwartz v. Schwartz

The primary concern is the child's best interests which is generally found to be furthered by "his being…