From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. J. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 31, 2014
CV 14-4144-AG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)

Opinion

          Edward J. Martinez, Petitioner, Pro se, Lancaster, CA.

          For J. Soto, Warden, Respondent: Seth Patrick McCutcheon, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          ANDREW J. GUILFORD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Martinez v. J. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 31, 2014
CV 14-4144-AG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Martinez v. J. Soto

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD J. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 31, 2014

Citations

CV 14-4144-AG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)