From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Hott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV671 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20CV671

10-30-2020

EVERILDO CORTEZ MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. RUSSELL HOTT, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner, a federal detainee proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By Memorandum Order entered on September 8, 2020, the Court directed Petitioner, within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof, to complete and return the standardized form for filing a § 2241 petition as required by Eastern District of Virginia Local Civil Rule 83.4(A). The Court warned Petitioner that the failure to comply with the above directive would result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

More than eleven (11) days have elapsed since the entry of the September 8, 2020 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not responded. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will be DENIED.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 30 October 2020
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Martinez v. Hott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV671 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Martinez v. Hott

Case Details

Full title:EVERILDO CORTEZ MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. RUSSELL HOTT, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20CV671 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2020)