From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
1:11-cv-01661-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01661-DLB (HC)

01-18-2012

EUGENE H. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. A. HEDGPETH, Respondent.


SECOND ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO INFORM THE COURT WHETHER HE WILL CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 1, 2011, the Clerk of the Court mailed a consent/decline form to petitioner, with information and instructions for informing the Court whether he would consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Petitioner has not returned the consent/decline form.

Accordingly, petitioner is ORDERED to tell the Court whether he will consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Petitioner must complete and return the consent/decline form within thirty (30) days. Failure to follow this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 110.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send to petitioner another copy of the consent/decline form and the instructions for consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Martinez v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
1:11-cv-01661-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Martinez v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE H. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. A. HEDGPETH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-01661-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)