From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Hawthorne

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Sep 4, 2014
NO. 09-13-00495-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 4, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-13-00495-CV

09-04-2014

DOYLE MARTINEZ, Appellant v. LYN N. HAWTHORNE D/B/A CLASSIC CONSIGNMENT AND SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees


On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 12-03-02745 CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Doyle Martinez filed a notice of appeal but failed to file a brief. On July 1, 2014, we notified the parties that the brief had not been filed and warned the appellant that his failure to file a brief could result in a dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. On July 21, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be submitted to the Court without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. "A court of appeals may not reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of properly assigned error." San Jacinto River Auth. v. Duke, 783 S.W.2d 209, 209-10 (Tex. 1990). In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

LEANNE JOHNSON

Justice
Submitted on August 11, 2014
Opinion Delivered September 4, 2014
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Hawthorne

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Sep 4, 2014
NO. 09-13-00495-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Martinez v. Hawthorne

Case Details

Full title:DOYLE MARTINEZ, Appellant v. LYN N. HAWTHORNE D/B/A CLASSIC CONSIGNMENT…

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Sep 4, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-13-00495-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 4, 2014)