From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Guirbino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2006
No. CIV-S-05-1887 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-05-1887 GEB KJM P.

August 7, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to respondents' July 10, 2006 motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, petitioner's request will be granted.

Petitioner also asks that respondents be held in default for filing their motion to dismiss late. However, the motion to dismiss was timely. See May 9, 2006 order; Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's July 19, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted;

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to respondents' July 10, 2006 motion to dismiss; and

3. Petitioner's July 19, 2006 "motion for default" is denied.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Guirbino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2006
No. CIV-S-05-1887 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Martinez v. Guirbino

Case Details

Full title:RALPH MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. GEORGE GUIRBINO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 7, 2006

Citations

No. CIV-S-05-1887 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)