Opinion
22-1792
02-16-2023
ROSIBEL MARTINEZ; A.D.C.C.M.; Y.S.C.M., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
James D. Brousseau, BROUSSEAU &LEE, PLLC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioners. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Zoe J. Heller, Senior Litigation Counsel, Karen L. Melnik, Senior Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: January 27, 2023
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
ON BRIEF:
James D. Brousseau, BROUSSEAU &LEE, PLLC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioners.
Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Zoe J. Heller, Senior Litigation Counsel, Karen L. Melnik, Senior Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WYNN and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rosibel Martinez and her two daughters, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge's decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED