From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1987
503 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-37.

February 24, 1987. Rehearing Denied March 31, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Fredricka G. Smith, J.

Stuart J. Edelman, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Stuzin and Camner, P.A., and Juan A. Gonzalez and Richard Burnstein, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


We reverse and remand the order denying the appellant Martinez's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him as the guarantor of corporate debts. The issue of the corporations' defaults and other issues of the corporations' liability have not yet been decided. It appears from the record that another, related action involving the corporate debtors was proceeding in the bankruptcy court and led Martinez into the false belief that his interests were being protected in the unstayed state proceedings. See North Shore Hosp., Inc., v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1962); B.C. Builders Supply Co. v. Maldonado, 405 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

On remand, we direct the court to reconsider its order compelling post-judgment discovery and denying Martinez's motion for a protective order.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1987
503 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Martinez v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ERASMO MARTINEZ, APPELLANT, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 31, 1987

Citations

503 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Appliance Ref. Distrib. v. Fedders

This court, too, has recognized that where a defendant believes, rightly or wrongly, that his rights are…