Martinez v. Evans

Full title: RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff(s), v. MIKE EVANS, WARDEN, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 16, 2010

C 08-5293 CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2010)

Opinion

RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff(s), v. MIKE EVANS, WARDEN, et al., Defendant(s) No. C 08-5293 CRB (PR) United States District Court, N.D. California. April 16, 2010

          ORDER

         Docket # 49

          CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

         Per order filed on February 26, 2010, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to properly exhaust available administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The court dismissed plaintiff's improper point scheme claim and made clear that this action will proceed with plaintiff's deprivation of outdoor exercise claim only.

         Plaintiff has since filed a request for leave to file a motion for reconsideration and several other miscellaneous motions and requests. Plaintiff's request for leave to file a motion for reconsideration (docket # 49) is DENIED for lack of merit. See Civil L.R. 7-9(b). But the court requests that defendants file a response to plaintiff's other miscellaneous motions and requests (see docket # 46, 47 & 50) within 30 days of this order.

         SO ORDERED.