From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 15, 2014
100 A.3d 855 (Conn. 2014)

Opinion

10-15-2014

Renee MARTINEZ v. EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Hugh D. Hughes, New Haven, and Vincent R. Falcone, West Haven, in support of the petition. Daniel P. Scapellati, Hartford, in opposition.


Hugh D. Hughes, New Haven, and Vincent R. Falcone, West Haven, in support of the petition.

Daniel P. Scapellati, Hartford, in opposition.

Opinion

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 151 Conn.App. 213, 94 A.3d 711, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court based upon the trial court's finding that, at the time of the accident giving rise to the plaintiff's personal injury suit against Tony's Long Wharf Transport, LLC (Tony's), Tony's was not operating its vehicle ‘for-hire?’

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly find that, at the time of the accident giving rise to the plaintiff's personal injury suit against Tony's, the vehicle operated by Tony's was not engaged in interstate commerce?”


Summaries of

Martinez v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 15, 2014
100 A.3d 855 (Conn. 2014)
Case details for

Martinez v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Renee MARTINEZ v. EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

100 A.3d 855 (Conn. 2014)
314 Conn. 924

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

See State v. Dort, 315 Conn. 151, 169, 106 A.3d 277 (2014). The certification order originally stated that…

Martinez v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

The certification order originally stated that certification was granted limited to the following questions:…