From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Eischen

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 6, 2023
CIVIL 22-1390 (JRT/DTS) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2023)

Opinion

CIVIL 22-1390 (JRT/DTS)

07-06-2023

PAULO MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. B. EISCHEN, Respondent.

Paulo Martinez, Reg. pro se petitioner. Ana H Voss, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE for respondent.


Paulo Martinez, Reg. pro se petitioner.

Ana H Voss, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE for respondent.

ORDER

JOHN R. TUNHEIM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated June 2, 2023. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

The Court, being duly advised in the premises, upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Martinez's habeas petition [ECF No. 1] is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Eischen

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 6, 2023
CIVIL 22-1390 (JRT/DTS) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Martinez v. Eischen

Case Details

Full title:PAULO MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. B. EISCHEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 6, 2023

Citations

CIVIL 22-1390 (JRT/DTS) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2023)

Citing Cases

Franklin v. Fikes

“Because the Court can resolve [Petitioner's p]etition by relying on the record, an evidentiary hearing is…