From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Duquaine

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 17, 2023
2:23-cv-00363-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 17, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00363-JCM-NJK

08-17-2023

CRISTOBAL MELCHOR MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP CHRISTOPHER DUQUAINE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 19]

Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend discovery deadlines. Docket No. 19.

A request to extend discovery deadlines must include a statement specifying the discovery completed, a specific description of the discovery that remains, the reasons why the subject deadline cannot be met, and a proposed schedule for completing the outstanding discovery. Local Rule 26-3. The request must also be supported by a showing of good cause. Id. The good cause analysis turns on whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). This showing of diligence is measured by the movant's conduct throughout the entire period of time already allowed. CC.Mexicano.US, LLC v. Aero II Aviation, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169110, at *11-12 (D. Nev. Dec. 15, 2015). If diligence is not established, the Court's inquiry should end. Johnson, 975 F.2d at 609 (internal citation omitted).

Here the parties have not demonstrated diligence. Without any additional information, the parties submit that Plaintiff has provided medical record authorizations to Defendants and that the parties have exchanged unspecified written discovery requests. Docket No. 19 at 2. Such a minimal submission does not allow the court to evaluate the parties' conduct during the time allowed so far and the Court cannot, therefore, find that the parties have acted diligently.

However, as a one-time courtesy to the parties, the Court will extend this case's discovery deadlines. Accordingly, the parties' stipulation to extend discovery deadlines is GRANTED. Docket No. 19. The scheduling order is MODIFIED as follows:

Initial Experts

November 29, 2023

Rebuttal Experts

January 29, 2024

Discovery Cut-Off

June 6, 2024

Dispositive Motions

March 28, 2024

Joint Pretrial Order

May 30, 2024, 30 days after the resolution of dispositive motions, or further Court order.

Given the length of the instant extension being granted, the Court is not inclined to grant any further extensions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Duquaine

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 17, 2023
2:23-cv-00363-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Martinez v. Duquaine

Case Details

Full title:CRISTOBAL MELCHOR MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP CHRISTOPHER DUQUAINE, et…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 17, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00363-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 17, 2023)