From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division
Nov 21, 2022
No. EP-22-CV-00135-KC-ATB (W.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2022)

Opinion

EP-22-CV-00135-KC-ATB

11-21-2022

EL PA LILIA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF

ANNE T. BERTON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On this day, the Court considers “Plaintiff's Brief,” filed on November 19, 2022, in the above-captioned matter. (ECF No. 16). Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(c)(2), the page limit for Plaintiff's Brief is twenty pages “exclusive of the caption, the signature block, any certificate, and any accompanying documents.” W.D. Tex. Civ. R. 7(c)(2). Plaintiff's Brief is approximately thirty-three pages, exclusive of the caption, table of contents, signature block, certificates, and accompanying documents. See (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff did not request the Court's permission to exceed the page limit. Therefore, Plaintiff's Brief is improperly filed.

Moreover, the Court finds that leave to exceed the page limit in this case is unwarranted. Federal courts have “inherent power ‘to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.'” Woodson v. Surgitek, Inc., 57 F.3d 1406, 1417 (5th Cir. 1995) (quoting Linkv. WabashR.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962)). One such way to manage affairs is to establish page limits. See Barnes v. Tumlinson, 597 Fed.Appx. 798, 799 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam). In the instant case, the Court finds no indication of novel issues requiring extensive briefing beyond the Court's page limits. See Gulf Petro Trading Co. v. Nigerian Nat'l Petroleum Corp., 233 F.R.D. 492, 493 (E.D. Tex. 2005).

The Court also notes that attorneys at the Konoski & Partners, PC law firm have repeatedly exceeded the Local Rule CV-7 page limits. See, e.g., No. 1:21-cv-00731-RP-SH (ECF No. 13); No. 3:21-cv-00082-LS (ECF No. 12); No. 3:22-cv-00073-FM-LS (ECF No. 15); No. 3:22-cv-00101-KC-ATB (ECF No. 13); No. 3:22-cv-00120-FM-RFC (ECF No. 16); and No. 3:22-cv-00222-FM-RFC (ECF No. 18).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Brief (ECF No. 16) be STRICKEN from the record. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff file a brief that complies with the Local Rule CV-7 page limits and Local Rule CV-10 formatting requirements on or before November 28, 2022. Any requests to exceed the page limit will be denied.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division
Nov 21, 2022
No. EP-22-CV-00135-KC-ATB (W.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Martinez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:EL PA LILIA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division

Date published: Nov 21, 2022

Citations

No. EP-22-CV-00135-KC-ATB (W.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2022)