From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN

07-13-2012

Tony Martinez, Plaintiff, v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp., dba Columbia Sportswear Company #446; Eddie Bauer, a Delaware LLC, dba Eddie Bauer Outlet #R-867; New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. dba New Balance #0015, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES

This matter is deemed suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. R. 230(g).

Defendants Eddie Bauer and Columbia each move for attorney fees under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12205, which prescribes that "the court . . . , in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party . . . a reasonable attorney[] fee[.]" However, Defendants have not shown that Plaintiff's ADA claims were "frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation." Summers v. A. Teichert & Sons, Inc., 127 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir. 1997) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Therefore, each Defendant's motion for attorney fees is DENIED.

____________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.,

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martinez v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Martinez v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Tony Martinez, Plaintiff, v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp., dba Columbia…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)