From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Cnty. of Rockland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 12, 2022
21 CV 01276 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2022)

Opinion

21 CV 01276 (KMK)

10-12-2022

Odclvin Jacinto Martinez, Plaintiff, v. County Of Rockland, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge:

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the light to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty' days day period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are denied. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Cnty. of Rockland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 12, 2022
21 CV 01276 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Martinez v. Cnty. of Rockland

Case Details

Full title:Odclvin Jacinto Martinez, Plaintiff, v. County Of Rockland, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 12, 2022

Citations

21 CV 01276 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2022)