From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 4, 2022
2:21-cv-01223-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01223-MCE-CKD

11-04-2022

ADAN MARTINEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a Government Entity; ERIC TOOMEY, an individual police officer; and NICHOLAS CARO, an individual police officer, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Dean Gazzo Roistacher LLP Mitchell D. Dean, Esq. (SBN 128926) Adrian M. Paris, Esq. (SBN 301355) Attorneys for Defendants City of Sacramento, Eric Toomey, and Nicholas Caro Reza Sina, Esq. Sina Law Group Attorneys for Plaintiff Adan Martinez


Complaint Filed: July 12, 2021

Dean Gazzo Roistacher LLP

Mitchell D. Dean, Esq. (SBN 128926)

Adrian M. Paris, Esq. (SBN 301355)

Attorneys for Defendants

City of Sacramento, Eric Toomey, and Nicholas Caro

Reza Sina, Esq.

Sina Law Group

Attorneys for Plaintiff Adan Martinez

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

Morrison C. England, Jr., Judge

Having reviewed and considered the associated Stipulation, the scheduling order is modified to reflect the following deadlines:

Fact Discovery Cut-Off: March 17, 2023

Expert Disclosure: April 14, 2023

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: May 15, 2023

Motion Cut-Off: August 14, 2023

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 4, 2022
2:21-cv-01223-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Martinez v. City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ADAN MARTINEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 4, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01223-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2022)