From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. City of Melbourne

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Mar 21, 2006
Case No. 6:06-cv-90-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Mar. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 6:06-cv-90-Orl-31DAB.

March 21, 2006


ORDER


On March 7, 2006, Magistrate Judge Baker entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23), recommending that the Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant City of Melbourne (Doc. 7) be granted in part and the Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant Johns Eastern Company, Inc. (Doc. 19) be denied as moot. The Plaintiff filed a timely response in opposition (Doc. 24) to the Motion to Dismiss Complaint, which the Court construes as an objection to the Report. Upon de novo review of the above, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is, therefore

ORDERED that:

1. That the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and confirmed;

2. The Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant City of Melbourne (Doc. 7) is GRANTED IN PART. The federal claims alleged in the Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the remaining state law claims are REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Brevard County, Florida.

3. The Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant Johns Eastern Company, Inc. (Doc. 19) is DENIED AS MOOT.

4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. City of Melbourne

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Mar 21, 2006
Case No. 6:06-cv-90-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Mar. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Martinez v. City of Melbourne

Case Details

Full title:EVELYN MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MELBOURNE and JOHNS EASTERN…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Mar 21, 2006

Citations

Case No. 6:06-cv-90-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Mar. 21, 2006)