From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. City of Fort Worth

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 4, 2009
No. 02-08-344-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. 02-08-344-CV

Delivered: June 4, 2009.

Appealed from the 236th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On February 19, 2009, after considering "Appellants' Motion To Dismiss" and "Appellants' Motion For Continuance, Or In The Alternative Amended Motion To Dismiss," we ordered this appeal continued and suspended all appellate deadlines unless by or before May 20, 2009, the court received written notice from any party regarding whether a settlement had been reached. We stated that if no notice was received by May 20, 2009, we would automatically dismiss the appeal without further order from this court. We have not received any notice regarding whether a settlement was reached.

Because we have not received notice regarding whether a settlement was reached, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Martinez v. City of Fort Worth

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 4, 2009
No. 02-08-344-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Martinez v. City of Fort Worth

Case Details

Full title:CHARLIE S. MARTINEZ, JR. AND MAGDALENA S. MARTINEZ, AS TRUSTEE OF THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

No. 02-08-344-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 4, 2009)