From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2012
1:11-CV-00572 AWI MJS HC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-CV-00572 AWI MJS HC

07-10-2012

DANIEL J. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO

FILE RESPONSE


SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On April 30, 2012, the Court denied Respondent's motion to dismiss, and referred the matter to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Accordingly, Respondent is hereby ordered to file a response to the petition within sixty (60) days of the date of service of this order. The traverse, opposition and reply shall be filed in accordance to the instructions set forth in the briefing schedule previously issued by this Court on September 14, 2011. (Briefing Schedule, ECF No. 6.) IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Martinez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2012
1:11-CV-00572 AWI MJS HC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Martinez v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL J. MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 10, 2012

Citations

1:11-CV-00572 AWI MJS HC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)