From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 16, 2017
Case No. 1:14-cv-00405-DAD-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-00405-DAD-JLT (PC)

02-16-2017

JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. BEARD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE AS TO "JESSE A." ONLY

(Doc. 86)

On February 7, 2017, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of defendant, "Jesse A." only. (Doc. 86) Jesse A. has not appeared in this action. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Jesse A. only in light of the notice of dismissal filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16 , 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Martinez v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 16, 2017
Case No. 1:14-cv-00405-DAD-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Martinez v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. BEARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 16, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-00405-DAD-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2017)