From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
May 17, 2010
No. CIV 09-729 JAP/LFG (D.N.M. May. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV 09-729 JAP/LFG.

May 17, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION AND REMANDING CASE


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Analysis and Recommended Disposition, filed April 20, 2010 [Doc. 22]. No objections were filed, and the deadline for filing objections has passed. A party waives the right to challenge a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation if the party does not file timely objections. Conley v. Mullin, No. 07-6046, 245 F. App'x 863, 864-65 (10th Cir. Aug. 30, 2007) (unpublished). The Court accepts the analysis and recommended disposition with the result that Plaintiff's motion granted and this matter is remanded for additional administrative hearings, as described in the Magistrate Judge Analysis and Recommended Disposition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Analysis and Recommended Disposition is adopted by the Court;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to remand is granted with the result that this matter is remanded for additional administrative hearings.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
May 17, 2010
No. CIV 09-729 JAP/LFG (D.N.M. May. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Martinez v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL A. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: May 17, 2010

Citations

No. CIV 09-729 JAP/LFG (D.N.M. May. 17, 2010)