From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 29, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-CV-02408-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:10-CV-02408-SKO

08-29-2011

SAMUEL P. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorneys for Plaintiff SAMUEL P. MARTINEZ


Steven G. Rosales

Attorney at Law: 222224

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Attorneys for Plaintiff SAMUEL P. MARTINEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

TO THE HONORABLE SHELIA K. OBERTO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

Plaintiff Samuel P. Martinez ("Plaintiff") and defendant Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant"), through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the time for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff's Opening Brief to October 10, 2011; and that Defendant shall have until November 9, 2011, to file his opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff will be due November 23, 2011.

An extension of time for plaintiff is needed due to a serious illness in Counsel's family. An extension of time for plaintiff is needed due to a serious illness in Counsel's family. On June 21, 2011, Counsel's Spouse started chemotherapy to treat a diagnosis of Stage IV breast cancer. As a result of the sudden onset of what is obviously a serious illness Counsel requires additional time to assist his Spouse through this obviously stressful experience.

Counsel sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may have had upon it or its staff.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING

Steven G. Rosales

Attorney for plaintiff SAMUEL P. MARTINEZ

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

Geralyn Gulseth

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

[*Via email authorization]

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff may have an extension of time, to and including October 10, 2011, in which to file Plaintiff's Opening Brief;

2. Defendant may have an extension of time to November 9, 2011, to consider the contentions raised in Plaintiff's Opening Brief, and file any opposition if necessary.

3. Any reply by Plaintiff will be due November 23, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Martinez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 29, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-CV-02408-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Martinez v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL P. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:10-CV-02408-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)