From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Ashley Apts. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2007
44 A.D.3d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-01991.

October 16, 2007.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated January 8, 2007, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification.

Keller, O'Reilly Watson, P.C., Woodbury, N.Y. (Patrick J. Engle of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellant.

Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company, New York, N.Y. (Thomas D. Hughes, Richard C. Rubenstein, and David D. Hess of counsel), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents.

Before: Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Skelos and Balkin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, since discovery has not been conducted, it would have been premature to grant summary judgment ( see Sportiello v City of New York, 6 AD3d 421, 422 [2004]). Moreover, as noted by the Supreme Court, the "conflicting self serving affidavits submitted by the representatives of the respective parties" preclude the granting of summary judgment at this juncture ( see Comerica Bank, N.A. v Benedict, 39 AD3d 456, 458; Thibeault v Travelers Ins. Co., 37 AD3d 1000, 1001; Dune Deck Owners Corp. v Liggett, 34 AD3d 523, 524).]


Summaries of

Martinez v. Ashley Apts. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2007
44 A.D.3d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Martinez v. Ashley Apts. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. ASHLEY APTS. CO., LLC, et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7824
842 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

McCloat v. SCC Constr. Mgmt. Grp.

Furthermore, no depositions have been conducted, including any depositions of key eyewitnesses identified in…

Mays-Carney v. Cnty. of Suffolk

Furthermore, no depositions have been conducted, including any depositions of key eyewitnesses identified in…