From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez-Segura v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 2, 2019
274 So. 3d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D17-4762

05-02-2019

Gerardo MARTINEZ-SEGURA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Gerardo Martinez-Segura, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Gerardo Martinez-Segura, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Gerardo Martinez-Segura appeals an order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion. Consistent with the State's concession, we reverse in part. The trial court erred in summarily denying as to grounds four and five, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's advice (or lack of advice) regarding the deportation consequences of Martinez-Segura's plea. On remand, the trial court must either attach records conclusively refuting these allegations or hold an evidentiary hearing. As to the remaining grounds, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martinez-Segura v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 2, 2019
274 So. 3d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Martinez-Segura v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERARDO MARTINEZ-SEGURA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 2, 2019

Citations

274 So. 3d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)