From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez-Cisneros v. Hufford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 5, 2014
13 Civ. 6888 (AT) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, 2014)

Opinion

13 Civ. 6888 (AT) (JCF)

08-05-2014

JORGE MARTINEZ-CISNEROS, Petitioner, v. MR. HUFFORD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION :

On September 26, 2013, Petitioner, Jorge Martinez-Cisneros, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On January 10, 2014, the Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV.

After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Francis issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R"), proposing that Petitioner's petition be denied as moot. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. Dunham v. City of New York, 11 Civ 1223, 2013 WL 929029, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2013). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Francis' R & R in its entirety. Petitioner's petition is DENIED as moot.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this order to pro se Petitioner.

SO ORDERED. Dated: August 5, 2014

New York, New York

/s/_________

ANALISA TORRES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martinez-Cisneros v. Hufford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 5, 2014
13 Civ. 6888 (AT) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Martinez-Cisneros v. Hufford

Case Details

Full title:JORGE MARTINEZ-CISNEROS, Petitioner, v. MR. HUFFORD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 5, 2014

Citations

13 Civ. 6888 (AT) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, 2014)

Citing Cases

Kidwell v. Hufford

The only relief sought by Kidwell—a nunc pro tunc designation of a state court sentence towards his federal…