From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez-Cedillo v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2019
918 F.3d 601 (9th Cir. 2019)

Opinion

No. 14-71742

03-18-2019

Marcelo MARTINEZ -CEDILLO, aka Marcelo Martinez, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.


ORDER

:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Miller did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Martinez-Cedillo v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2019
918 F.3d 601 (9th Cir. 2019)
Case details for

Martinez-Cedillo v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:MARCELO MARTINEZ-CEDILLO, AKA Marcelo Martinez, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 18, 2019

Citations

918 F.3d 601 (9th Cir. 2019)

Citing Cases

Diaz-Rodriguez v. Garland

We are not bound by Martinez-Cedillo ’s resolution of this issue. The three-judge panel's decision was…

Matthews v. Barr

The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Martinez-Cedillo and Judge Wardlaw’s dissent in that case were withdrawn…