From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martines v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1998
251 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 15, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by offering evidence that it neither affirmatively created the alleged defect nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence ( see, Mercer v. City of New York, 223 A.D.2d 688, affd 88 N.Y.2d 955; Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836). The plaintiff's opposition failed to create a triable issue of fact with respect to these issues ( see, Weber v. Sekapi, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 644; Kraemer v. K-Mart Corp., 226 A.D.2d 590; Cipolla v. Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 215 A.D.2d 346).

O'Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martines v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1998
251 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Martines v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET MARTINES, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Moore v. Smith

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the appellants' contention, they did not sustain…