From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Viles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 30, 2009
No. 2:04-cv-0756 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-0756 LKK JFM (PC).

June 30, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 30, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 30, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's February 13, 2009 and March 11, 2009 motions are denied.


Summaries of

Martin v. Viles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 30, 2009
No. 2:04-cv-0756 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Martin v. Viles

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN ANTHONY MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. L. VILES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 30, 2009

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-0756 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Gallagher v. Croudace

The Motion is, thus, untimely. See, e.g., Martin v. Viles, No. 2:04-cv-0756 LKK JFM (PC), 2009 WL 1211644, at…