Martin v. U.S. Dept

Full title: Robin S. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 15, 2008

303 F. App'x 478 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-56581.

Submitted December 1, 2008.^_

_ The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed December 15, 2008.

Robin S. Martin, Pasadena, CA, pro se.

Alarice M. Medrano, Esquire, USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Paul C. Epstein, Esquire, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General (LA), Timothy J. Harris, Esquire, Charlston Revich Wollitz, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, David B. Monks, Klinedinst P.C., San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, George H. King, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01105-GHK-AN.

Before: GOODWIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^__

__ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record and appellant's opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.