From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 17, 2013
522 F. App'x 914 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-5023

07-17-2013

SCOTT R. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

SCOTT R. MARTIN, of Reno, Nevada, pro se. CURTIS C. PETT, Attorney, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were KATHRYN KENEALLY, Assistant Attorney General, and KENNETH L. GREENE, Attorney.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 11-CV-0781, Judge James F. Merow.

SCOTT R. MARTIN, of Reno, Nevada, pro se.

CURTIS C. PETT, Attorney, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were KATHRYN KENEALLY, Assistant Attorney General, and KENNETH L. GREENE, Attorney.

Before NEWMAN, REYNA, and TARANTO,

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Scott R. Martin seeks enforcement of a claim of $4,250,000 in damages against the United States for alleged breach of an implied contract. For reasons stated by the Court of Federal Claims, we affirm the dismissal of Mr. Martin's claim for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Court of Federal Claims.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 17, 2013
522 F. App'x 914 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Martin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT R. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 2013

Citations

522 F. App'x 914 (Fed. Cir. 2013)