From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Stransenback

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jun 4, 1948
334 Ill. App. 624 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,232. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 4, 1948 Released for publication June 25, 1948

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 167.2reversible error in instruction in passenger's action for damages. In passenger's action for damages sustained when automobile in which he was riding collided with one being operated by defendant's intestate, instructing on passenger's behalf that jury could not single out fact that passenger was asleep at time of accident and from that fact alone decide that passenger was not exercising due care for his own safety was reversible error, where it was snowing at time of accident, and jury might have concluded that passenger, being only person in automobile other than driver, should have remained awake and assisted him.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lee county; the Hon. GEORGE C. DIXON, Judge, presiding.

Cause reversed and remanded. Heard in this court at the February term, 1948.

D.M. Gregg and Warner Warner, for appellant;

D.M. Gregg and Henry C. Warner, of counsel;

Dixon, Devine, Bracken Ryan, for appellees;

Robert L. Bracken and J.C. Ryan, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 4, 1948; released for publication June 25, 1948.


Summaries of

Martin v. Stransenback

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jun 4, 1948
334 Ill. App. 624 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Martin v. Stransenback

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Martin and Luther Martin, Appellees, v. Nellie Stransenback…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Jun 4, 1948

Citations

334 Ill. App. 624 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
79 N.E.2d 825

Citing Cases

Gilberto v. Nordtvedt

The fact that Gilberto might sue Caufield or that Caufield and Strossner could have sued Ramel did not…