That Dillon was not accosted prior to being robbed is not a sufficient difference in the incidents to require a finding that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the evidence of the Gwinnett robbery.See Martin v. State, 340 Ga. App. 773, 774-775 (1), 798 S.E.2d 326 (2017) (explaining that it was not an abuse of discretion to admit other act evidence when both incidents occurred within a month of each other and involved the robbery of purses from single women walking alone, with similar weapons and the same vehicle). See also Brannon v. State, 298 Ga. 601, 607 (4), 783 S.E.2d 642 (2016) (holding that car hijacking incidents were sufficiently similar for admission of one to show identity under Rule 404 (b) because they involved the same accomplices, same getaway cars, and same victims driving vehicles with "distinctive rims," and they occurred within 13 days of each other).