From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 11, 2012
386 S.W.3d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. WD 74021.

2012-12-11

David John MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge. S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge.


S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Mr. David John Martin appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He contends he received ineffective assistance of plea counsel and sentencing counsel.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 11, 2012
386 S.W.3d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:David John MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

386 S.W.3d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)